Undercover Video: Pfizer Scientist Expressed Concern Over Covid Vaccines Causing Heart Inflammation in 2021
“I work for an evil corporation… Our organization is run on COVID money."
In an undercover video from Project Veritas, a Pfizer senior associate scientist named Chris Croce appears to express concern over the mRNA shots being linked to a form of heart inflammation called myocarditis as early as 2021.
Despite this concern, Pfizer continued to back the "safe and 100% effective" line, even in regards to young persons at miniscule risk from the Covid disease.
“These data confirm the favorable efficacy and safety profile of our vaccine and position us to submit a Biologics License Application to the U.S. FDA,” said Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla in an April 2021 release. “The high vaccine efficacy observed through up to six months following a second dose and against the variant prevalent in South Africa provides further confidence in our vaccine’s overall effectiveness.”
In the video, Project Veritas reports that a Pfizer scientist acknowledged that the mRNA Covid shots were being tested for a potential link to myocarditis.
According to the video, Croce states that about 3,000 blood samples from patients were being sent to a laboratory for testing. Harvard Medical School researchers publishing at the American Heart Association's journal Circulation have since isolated "free spike antigens" in young persons that are being associated with an increased risk of myocarditis.
A potential link between the mRNA shots and myocarditis was established as early as July 2021. The MMWR report hosted at the National Institutes of Health acknowledged reports of myocarditis and pericarditis in mRNA vaccine recipients. The NIH, however, continued to recommend vaccination for young persons, even for those who had natural immunity from prior infection.
In a related video released in October of last year, the Pfizer scientist reportedly commented, “You’re protected for longer” if you have natural antibodies compared to the COVID vaccine's spike antibodies.
“You’re protected most likely for longer since there was a natural response,” he said.
In the video, he appears to add, “I work for an evil corporation… Our organization is run on COVID money.”
Nick Carl, one of the scientists, says on video: “When somebody is naturally immune—like they got COVID—they probably have better, like not better, but more antibodies against the virus."
“So your antibodies are probably better at that point than the vaccination,” he added later.
The New England Journal of Medicine in June 2021 established that natural immunity antibodies were superior to spike antibodies.
Natural immunity “protection was higher than that conferred after the same time had elapsed since receipt of a second dose of vaccine among previously uninfected persons,” the study concluded.
It was recently revealed by Elon Musk's #TwitterFiles that Pfizer director Scott Gottlieb had contacted Twitter's top lobbyist in August 2021 to shut down conversation on the social media platform about natural immunity.
Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla was earlier slammed by a British regulator for making “disgracefully misleading” claims about the Covid mRNA shots also known as “Covid vaccines.”
UK’s pharmaceutical watchdog, the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), found that Dr. Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, made “misleading” statements about healthy children purportedly benefiting from the vaccines.
In an interview with the BBC, Bourla claimed that “there is no doubt in my mind that the benefits, completely, are in favour of” vaccinating children ages five to 11 against Covid-19.
“There is simply no evidence that healthy schoolchildren in the UK are at significant risk from the SARS COV-2 virus and to imply that they are is disgracefully misleading,” watchdog group UsforThem said.
The pharmaceutical company is being sued by Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson, who is citing ‘falsified data’ and manipulated clinical trials in her legal argument that the company committed fraud.
Incredible.
While I believe trial lawyers are some of the worst people in the world, here is a situation where they could go after a variety of entities that allowed the misinformation campaign to be perpetrated, and there would be a shit ton of potential awards to the victims. This could dwarf the awards in asbestos/cigarettes and other class action suits.
This will never be resolved by having congressional hearings as too many of the pols are involved.
Let's unleash the lawyers....