Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Quality BS Detector's avatar

It would be awful, godawful in fact, if a President through sloppiness allowed dangerous weapons or materiel to fall into enemy hands.

I hope they prevented Trump from permitting $85 billion of highest grade weaponry (and cash) from falling into enemy hands because, you know, that would be unthinkable.

Unprecedented.

And we must never let that shite happen.

Expand full comment
cutter's avatar

By "nuclear," my bet is that the leaker didn't literally mean "nuclear weapons" but more like -- if Trump released the evidence it would be like Trump "going nuclear" against ... well, one can probably guess whom he might go nuclear against.

So the leaker was speaking colloquially, and the dimwits at WaPo thought they were being literal, and here we are.

The "nuclear" part might be whatever those photographs are ... but given the proximity of this story to Epstein, anything is possible.

Watch them try to charge Trump with possession of chyI'dprøn because he had pictures of [REDACTED] diddling a little girl...

The funniest part is, somehow these people are supposed to be our "elites."

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts