Chief Justice Roberts Fires Back at Trump After His Calls to Impeach Radical Judge
"Maybe it’s Chief Justice John Roberts who should be impeached for failure to uphold his duty to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."
The Supreme Court, long heralded as the guardian of constitutional integrity, is only as strong as the men and women who sit upon its bench. Unfortunately, its Chief Justice, John Roberts, has spent his tenure overseeing its steady decline into judicial activism, weak-willed appeasement, and outright dereliction of duty.
Justice Roberts’ latest public rebuke of President Trump for calling to impeach a rogue judge only reaffirms what has become obvious for years: Roberts is more concerned with preserving the Washington status quo than dispensing justice.
On Tuesday, Chief Justice Roberts came to the defense of Judge James Boasberg after President Trump called for his impeachment.
Boasberg, an Obama-appointed judge, infamously ordered planes deporting criminal Venezuelan aliens to turn around—an act of blatant judicial overreach that puts American citizens at risk. Yet rather than addressing the actual crisis of unelected judges subverting executive authority, Roberts clutched his pearls and issued a rare statement condemning Trump’s rhetoric.
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts intoned.
Roberts insists the normal appellate process exists for such disputes, as if we are still operating in an age where the judiciary respects its constitutional limits. This is the same Roberts who has passively watched as activist lower-court judges issued nationwide injunctions to obstruct President Trump’s agenda at every turn.
The same Roberts who sided with liberal justices to uphold Obamacare, a decision that required verbal gymnastics so contorted it should be studied in law schools as an example of bad faith jurisprudence.
Roberts has consistently demonstrated that his true loyalty is not to the Constitution, but to the Washington establishment. His tenure has been defined by cowardice and capitulation to the left’s relentless legal warfare. He did nothing to protect Americans’ rights during the Covid response, including mass censorship and federal vaccine mandates. He sat idly by as courts dismissed serious concerns about election integrity in 2020, often on flimsy procedural grounds. He has been silent as federal agencies colluded with Big Tech to censor Americans’ speech, a clear violation of the First Amendment.
The Chief Justice also has an ugly habit of invoking “judicial independence” only when it serves the interests of the left. His concern for the separation of powers is suspiciously absent when rogue judges intervene in matters of national security or immigration enforcement. He was all too happy to allow activist judges to run roughshod over Trump’s executive authority, yet he now warns of “intemperate” criticism of the judiciary when conservatives demand accountability.
Justice Roberts has issued similar pronouncements on judicial impeachments in the past.
“Public officials … regrettably have engaged in recent attempts to intimidate judges — for example, suggesting political bias in the judge’s adverse rulings without a credible basis for such allegations,” Roberts wrote in a New Year’s Eve message in 2024.
“Attempts to intimidate judges for their rulings in cases are inappropriate and should be vigorously opposed. Public officials certainly have a right to criticize the work of the judiciary, but they should be mindful that intemperance in their statements when it comes to judges may prompt dangerous reactions by others.”
Roberts’ pearl-clutching about the integrity of the courts would be laughable if the stakes weren’t so high. America is suffering under a judiciary that increasingly acts as an unelected super-legislature, overturning laws it doesn’t like and inventing new “rights” out of thin air.
The very legitimacy of the courts is in peril precisely because of judges like Boasberg, who view their benches as platforms for political activism rather than guardians of the Constitution. If Roberts was truly concerned about judicial integrity, he would focus his energy on reining in these radical judges—not scolding Trump for calling attention to their corruption.
Let’s be clear: impeachment is absolutely an appropriate remedy for judges who grossly exceed their authority. The Founding Fathers included this mechanism for a reason. When a judge ceases to rule based on the law and instead imposes his personal ideology, he forfeits his right to serve.
Judge Boasberg’s decision to halt deportations of violent criminals is not just a bad ruling—it is a willful dereliction of duty that endangers the American public. If Roberts had any sense of moral clarity, he would recognize this as the real crisis, rather than fixating on Trump’s rhetorical flourishes.
But moral clarity is precisely what Roberts lacks. He has shown time and again that he is more interested in preserving the Supreme Court’s image than in delivering justice. His obsession with “protecting” the judiciary from criticism has led him to shield its worst actors while leaving the Constitution defenseless. He cares more about the approval of the Washington Post editorial board than the well-being of the American people.
If Roberts believes that Supreme Court justices are beyond criticism and immune from accountability, he is deeply mistaken. He has presided over one of the most shameful periods in judicial history—a time in which the courts have been weaponized against the will of the people.
John Roberts is not a guardian of the Constitution. He is a political operative in a black robe. His record speaks for itself: weak, inconsistent, and always tilting in favor of the ruling class over the will of the people. If he truly cared about the integrity of the judiciary, he would resign in disgrace.
America deserves better than a Chief Justice who acts as a Deep State puppet. The Supreme Court was meant to be the last bulwark against tyranny—not a rubber stamp for it. If Roberts won’t defend the Constitution, then it’s time for a judiciary that will.
Maybe it’s Chief Justice John Roberts who should be impeached for failure to uphold his duty to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Chief Justice John Roberts is facing renewed scrutiny after his past connection to Chief Judge James E. “Jeb” Boasberg has come under the spotlight. Boasberg, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court by former President Barack Obama in 2011, was later tapped by Roberts in 2014 to serve on the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA), which approved surveillance on President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.
The connection has drawn sharp criticism, as Boasberg now finds himself at the center of an impeachment effort led by House Republicans. Boasberg, who currently serves as the Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, has been accused of judicial overreach in blocking President Trump’s deportation efforts.
John Roberts, brought to you by the Bush Crime Family.