The CDC Has Been Warned a 'Criminal' Fraud Investigation is 'Ready to Go' After Midterm Elections

A New York Times article is now providing all the evidence lawmakers need to go after the CDC for 'criminal' fraud. Two Covid experts say an investigation is 'ready to go.'

Dr. Robert Malone, a noted mRNA vaccine researcher, and Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most-published medical doctors in the world, gave a joint statement to The New American on Friday where they accused the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of perpetrating "criminal" fraud. Watch:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox

"This Is Scientific Fraud" | Dr. Malone and Dr. McCullough Condemn the CDC "There are going to be legal consequences, and I believe they have a choice. These government employees have been participating in hiding this data. They can either be defendants or they can be witnesses"

"In my opinion, withholding scientific data constitutes fraud," Dr. Malone argued. "This is scientific fraud. In my opinion, if I was to publish a study in which I had a large body of epidemiologic data, and I decided to only public publish part of it because I wanted to advance some agenda, I would be guilty of scientific fraud. The paper would be withdrawn. I would be kicked out of my academic institution. I would be guilty of scientific fraud. That's what this is."

"And the CDC has, I've watched it over the years, become more and more and more a political arm and not serving its its function," he continued.  "This is the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. They are the archive of information which physicians have relied on for decades through the MMWR publication. They are the ones that are responsible for providing us the frontline data about what's going on and where it's happening and they have stopped performing that function."

"They no longer release that detailed information through MMWR," Dr. Malone went on. "They have become purely a political organization and arm of the executive branch. And what they have done is in my opinion, obscene. And it is part of what's underlied the attacks that Peter and I have sustained from the press. If you think about it, the underlying thesis is, 'well, the CDC didn't say that, so therefore you're spreading medical misinformation.' But now we learn who's really been spreading medical misinformation is the CDC."

"I think we're all owed an apology," he went on. "I think that this data that they have been withholding, it's not just the 18-to-49-year-old triple boost efficacy data. It is a ton of information. They've been intentionally withholding it. That's why we've been attacked. It is unjust. We are the ones, it turns out, we are completely vindicated. We have been speaking truth."