The Big Lie That Covid-19 Was 'Pandemic of the Unvaccinated' is Destroyed Once-and-for-All by New Scientific Study

The study revealed the false claim that mRNA shots would stop the spread of Covid-19 was even worse than misleading — it was the exact opposite.

New scientific research shows that the vaccinated are more than twice as likely to be infected with Covid-19 than those who had a prior infection.

This research shows that Covid-19 vaccines are associated with more spread of the virus reveals that the Big Lie that vaccines "stop the spread" was even worse than at first glance. Public health officials' arguments that "vaccine passports" would help protect communities from the spread of the virus turns out to be entirely fraudulent. The emotional appeal that Covid vaccines somehow protect your family members is now shown to be entirely without merit. The brazen claim that Covid-19 was a "pandemic of the unvaccinated" turns out to be completely bogus.

Vaccination is a personal health decision. It should be left up to a patient and a doctor. That is the end of the discussion.

The American Public Health Association article revealed the false claim that mRNA shots would stop the spread of Covid-19 was even worse than misleading — it was the exact opposite.

"Six months after the index date, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly higher in vaccine recipients (6.7%) than the previously infected (2.9%)," the researchers found.

There was further problems for claims about the mRNA shots that was uncovered by the researchers. The study found that the mRNA vaccines were effective at preventing emergency room visits and deaths in those who do not have prior infections, but at a far lower rate than the "100% safe and effective" claim that accompanied the vaccine rollouts.

"All-cause mortality in the vaccinated, however, was 37% lower than that of the previously infected," the researchers add. "The rates of all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations were 24% and 37% lower in the vaccinated than in the previously infected."

The study is flawed in at least one aspect: The researchers started counting infections 30 days after the first mRNA shot, which is a period when many report being particularly vulnerable to infection. Furthermore, the researchers did not count an infection for a vaccinated individual six months after receiving the mRNA shots. Thus, inclusion of that data would make the performance look much worse for the Covid shots.

The Washington Post recently drove another nail in the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" coffin with its analysis that the majority of Americans dying from Covid-19 were at one point “fully vaccinated.”

“For the first time, a majority of Americans dying from the coronavirus received at least the primary series of the vaccine,” the Post analysis conceded.

Another recent study, released in December 2022, shows that the bivalent vaccine had only a modest benefit that waned rapidly. The pre-print study based on Cleveland Clinic employees shows how quickly the boosters wear off.

"Among 51011 employees, 20689 (41%) had had a previous documented episode of COVID-19, and 42064 (83%) had received at least two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine," the researchers state. "COVID-19 occurred in 2452 (5%) during the study. Risk of COVID-19 increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received."

"In multivariable analysis, the bivalent vaccinated state was independently associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, .70; 95% C.I., .61-.80), leading to an estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 30% (95% CI, 20-39%)," the researchers state. "Compared to last exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within 90 days, last exposure 6-9 months previously was associated with twice the risk of COVID-19, and last exposure 9-12 months previously with 3.5 times the risk."

"The bivalent COVID-19 vaccine given to working-aged adults afforded modest protection overall against COVID-19, while the virus strains dominant in the community were those represented in the vaccine," the researchers conclude.

The researchers appear to make a false assertion while attempting to argue for the lackluster results for the bivalent boosters.

"The study has several limitations," the study states. "Individuals with unrecognized prior infection would have been misclassified as previously uninfected. Since prior infection protects against subsequent infection, such misclassification would have resulted in underestimating the protective effect of the vaccine."

Actually, it's precisely the obverse: A misclassified "previously uninfected" person would have antibodies, thus overestimating the protective effect of any vaccine.

The researchers then proceed to assert that the Omicron variant rendered natural immunity meaningless for the prior infected.

"The arrival of the Omicron variant in December 2021, brought a significant change to the immune protection landscape," the authors claim. "Previously infected or vaccinated individuals were no longer protected from COVID-19."

However, Johns Hopkins researchers published a study in early 2022 that showed natural immunity provided Covid protection that lasted for 650 days with no discernible decline.

For three different types of important antibodies, about 95% of people with prior infections retained all three types and 99% retained the anti-RBD positive type of antibody.

As reported earlier, the Centers for Disease Control and Infection (CDC) tracks the seroprevalence of nucleocapsid antibodies that are an indicator of SARS-CoV-2 exposure on its serohub.

Serohub shows that as of July 2022, 97% of the American public had been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Many of these Americans with prior infections were exposed to the Omicron variant.

Most Americans have durable and long-lasting natural immunity to Covid-19. Those with prior infections have noticed that with each virus "wave," the symptoms get less severe. This is consistent with viral pandemics throughout human history. There is herd immunity — and it is accompanied by herd instinct.

No amount of gaslighting and coercion can convince significantly more than 20% of healthy people to willingly get never-ending "boosters." That won't stop Big Pharma from trying.