FDA Stonewalls After Judge Refused to Give It 75 Years to Produce Vaccine Data, Pfizer Has Now Intervened
"It's no wonder the FDA doesn't want to release the documents. And judging by Pfizer's behavior, it doesn't want the FDA to release them, either."
The Food and Drug Administration thought it was appropriate that it be given 75 years to produce data for vaccines, which have proven to be the basis for the biggest public policy disaster in U.S. history.
The judge instead ordered it to fork over the documents at a rate over a hundred times faster what it had requested.
“I am pleased to report that a federal judge soundly rejected the FDA’s request and ordered the FDA to produce all the data at a clip of 55,000 pages per month!” Aaron Siri, who is the key litigator in the case, announced earlier on his Substack page.
But in an update to the legal battle, Siri now indicates that the FDA is dragging its feet while providing flimsy excuses about why it won't do what it was ordered.
The FDA "has now asked the Court to make the public wait until May for it to start producing 55,000 pages per month and, even then, claims it may not be able to meet this rate," Siri writes.
"The FDA’s excuse?" he asked rhetorically. "As explained in the brief opposing the FDA’s request, the FDA’s defense effectively amounts to claiming that the 11 document reviewers it has already assigned and the 17 additional reviewers being onboarded are only capable of reading at the speed of preschoolers."
Even more ominously for scientific transparency and the rule of law, Pfizer has even intervened in the case.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to "Relentless" Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.