Dr. Birx Makes Stunning Confession — She and Fauci 'Overplayed the Vaccines'
"America's medical professionals decided it was much more lucrative and politically expedient to sell Big Pharma's 'vaccinations' at all costs than to tell the truth."
Two of America's most prominent public health officials, former Covid response coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx and the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony Fauci, made media appearances this week that addressed the Covid vaccine rollout.
On Friday, Dr. Birx confessed that U.S. health officials 'overplayed the vaccine' on Fox News’s 'Your World' with Neil Cavuto.
“I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection,” Birx said.
“And I think we overplayed the vaccines," she added. “And it made people then worry that it’s not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization.”
As explained in commentary on Twitter, Dr. Birx's subsequent admission that 50% of those who died via Omicron were 'older and vaccinated' almost certainly suggests data fraud.
If the Covid vaccines have the '100% efficacy rate' that was claimed, then it is statistically impossible that half the population that dies with a virus would be 'vaccinated' — that is, of course, unless the mortality figures were highly flawed to begin with.
Since the average age of Covid mortality was near life expectancy (77 years old) and included patients with multiple comorbidities (95% of all deaths), then the 'one million' Covid deaths reported include hundreds of thousands of Americans whose imminent death was 'baked in the cake.'
Because the vaccines failed to lower excess mortality in 2021, there is also cause to question their purported efficacy.
Dr. Birx recently admitted to fudging data while she was working in the Trump administration.
“Before posting my final review of D. Birx’s book, I offer you one more excerpt on how she doctored the weekly Covid reports to the states coming from the White House,” Jeffrey Tucker wrote. “You won’t believe this one.”
Tucker provided the passage in Dr. Birx’s book that explained the process for writing reports. It directly implicates Birx in obfuscating data and misleading state officials.
“Our Saturday and Sunday report-writing routine soon became: write, submit, revise, hide, resubmit. Fortunately, this strategic sleigh-of-hand worked.”
Dr. Birx actually admitted in an April 2020 press conference that the U.S. was taking a 'liberal' approach to Covid-related mortality rates that was not being taken in most other nations.
"So, I think in this country, we've taken a very liberal approach to mortality," Birx said.. "There are other countries that if you had a preexisting condition, and let's say, the virus called you to go to the ICU, and then have a heart or kidney problem, some countries are recording that as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID-19 death. Right now we're still recording it. And we'll, I mean, the great thing about having forms that come in and a form that has the ability to mark it as COVID 19 infection. The intent is right now that those, if someone dies with COVID 19, we are counting that as a COVID 19 death."
CDC statistics show that 95% of Covid-related deaths list an average of 4 comorbidities, while 5% list Covid as the only known cause of death. Such comorbidites include cardiovascular disease (10.5%), diabetes (7.3%), and cancer (5.6%).
The initial series of two shots was sold to the American people as leading to being 'fully vaccinated' against Covid-19. There are now five recommended Covid-19 shots, which do not prevent transmission of the virus.
Dr. Anthony Fauci acknowledged in a Fox News interview with Bret Baier on Friday that the Covid vaccines have waning protection and blamed the mutating strains on the need for 'boosters.'
“What was true two years ago, a year and a half ago, changes because the original ancestral strain did not at all have the transmission capability that we’re dealing with with the omicron sublineages, particularly BA. 5,” Fauci said.
“So the vaccine does protect some people, not 95 percent, from getting infected, from getting symptoms, and getting severe disease," he continued. “It does a much better job at protecting a high percentage of people from progressing from severe disease.”
“We need vaccines that are better,” he added. “That are better because of the breadth and the durability because we know that immunity wanes over several months. And that’s the reason why we have boosters. But also, we need vaccines that protect against infection.”
This suddenly measured tone about the 'vaccines' is a far cry from the laudatory manner that Covid-19 shots were sold to the American people. The mRNA shots were mandated to millions of people without the scientists fully understanding the science about the novel coronavirus or the vaccine side effects.
There is also the matter of 'natural immunity,' which the public health experts avoid speaking about at all costs. The 'New England Journal of Medicine' in June published a study proving that natural immunity is more effective than vaccinated immunity alone.
Dr. Fauci had once called natural immunity from prior infection the "best protection." But at some point, America's medical professionals decided it was much more lucrative and politically expedient to sell Big Pharma's 'vaccinations' at all costs than to tell the truth.
LOL “We need vaccines that are better,” says mr. quadriple-vaxx'd-suffering-from-covid Fauci, which is funny because the garbage they've been injecting us with for the past 2 years now hasn't been properly tested. we don't know what's in it, they probably don't either and so maybe, juuuuust maybe they'll do some real testing before they'll swamp us with their next batches of poison.
She was hired by Pottinger. A family relationship. By marriage. https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=reader2?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fmichael%2520sengor&utm_medium=reader2
And documented by Snake Oil: How Xi Jinping Shut Down the World is In January 2020, Pottinger unilaterally called meetings and ratcheted up alarm about the new coronavirus in the White House based on information from his own sources in China, despite having no official intelligence to back up his alarmism, breaching protocol on several occasions.
In Washington, Matt Pottinger was first made aware of the new coronavirus after China’s CDC Director called US CDC Director Robert Redfield to report it on January 3, 2020. According to Pottinger, he grew increasingly alarmed due to the rumors he saw on Chinese social media. As Wright reports:
He was struck by the disparity between official accounts of the novel coronavirus in China, which scarcely mentioned the disease, and Chinese social media, which was aflame with rumors and anecdotes.
Pottinger therefore authorized the first interagency meeting on the coronavirus based on these social media reports. There was no official intelligence to prompt the meeting.
On January 14, Pottinger authorized a briefing for the NSC staff by the State Department and the Department of Health and Human Services, along with CDC director Redfield. That first interagency meeting to discuss the situation in Wuhan wasn’t prompted by official intelligence; in fact, there was practically none of that.
On January 27, 2020, Trump’s staff attended the first full meeting on the coronavirus in the White House Situation Room. Unbeknownst to those in attendance, Pottinger had unilaterally called the meeting. Others urged calm, but Pottinger immediately began pushing for travel bans. As Abutaleb writes:
Few people in the room knew it, but Pottinger had actually called the meeting. The Chinese weren’t providing the US government much information about the virus, and Pottinger didn’t trust what they were disclosing anyway. He had spent two weeks scouring Chinese social media feeds and had uncovered dramatic reports of the new infectious disease suggesting that it was much worse than the Chinese government had revealed. He had also seen reports that the virus might have escaped from a lab in Wuhan, China. There were too many unanswered questions. He told everyone in the Sit Room that they needed to consider enacting a travel ban immediately: ban all travel from China; shut it down…
[Pottinger] spent several days calling some of his old contacts in China, doctors who would tell him the truth. And they had told him that things were bad—and only going to get worse. Pottinger’s discourse was measured but he conveyed the gravity of the threat. He said that the virus was spreading fast. He said that dramatic actions would need to be taken, which was why the government should consider banning travel from China to the United States until it had a better understanding of what was going on. As he continued, people sat up in their chairs. This was not the “we’ve got everything handled” message that Azar had conveyed just minutes earlier.
As Wright documents, the health officials thought travel restrictions would be futile.
Predictably, the public health representatives were resistant, too: viruses found ways to travel no matter what. Moreover, at least 14,000 passengers from China were arriving in the U.S. every day; there was no feasible way to quarantine them all. These arguments would join a parade of other public health verities that would be jettisoned during the pandemic.
Among those present, Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney appears to have been the only one to express skepticism of Pottinger’s information. As Abutaleb writes:
Mulvaney intervened to wrap things up. He could tell that Pottinger and a few others were calling for a dramatic change, one that was an anathema to his libertarian instincts. He was pretty skeptical of Pottinger’s “sources” in China, too. They weren’t going to be setting US policy based on what someone had heard from their “friend” thousands of miles away. Mulvaney reiterated that they would reconvene the next day to discuss matters again before anything was settled. He warned attendees not to leak any details of the meeting to the media.
The next morning, January 28, 2020, Pottinger says he spoke to a doctor in China who told him the new coronavirus would be as bad as the 1918 Spanish flu, and that half the cases were asymptomatic. As Rogin writes:
The next morning, Pottinger had a conversation with a very high-level doctor in China, one who had spoken with health officials in several provinces, including Wuhan. This was a trusted source who was in a position to know the ground truth. “Is this going to be as bad as SARS in 2003?” he asked the doctor, whose name must remain secret for his own protection. “Forget SARS in 2003,” the doctor replied, “this is 1918.”
The doctor told Pottinger half the cases were asymptomatic and the government must have known all about it.
Later that same day, National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien brought Pottinger into the Oval Office, where he seized the first opportunity to repeat to the President what the doctor in China had told him that morning.
“This is the single greatest national security crisis of your presidency and it’s now unfolding,” O’Brien told the president. “It’s going to be 1918,” Pottinger told Trump. “Holy fuck,” the president replied.
Wright goes into more detail on this meeting, in which Pottinger interjected to alarm the President:
Later that day, the national security adviser, Robert O’Brien, brought Pottinger into the Oval Office, where the president was getting his daily intelligence briefing. Far down the list of threats was the mysterious new virus in China. The briefer didn’t seem to take it seriously. O’Brien did. “This will be the biggest national security threat you will face in your presidency,” he warned. “Is this going to be as bad or worse than SARS in 2003?” Trump asked. The briefer responded that it wasn’t clear yet. Pottinger, who was sitting on a couch, jumped to his feet. He had seen enough high-level arguments in the Oval Office to know that Trump relished clashes between agencies. “Mr. President, I actually covered that,” he said, recounting his experience with SARS and what he was learning now from his sources—most shockingly, that more than half of the spread of the disease was by asymptomatic carriers. China had already curbed travel within the country, but every day thousands of people were traveling from China to the U.S.—half a million in January alone. “Should we shut down travel?” the president asked. “Yes,” Pottinger said unequivocally.