Bombshell New Data from Australia May Eliminate Final Reason Anyone Would Take the Covid Vaccines
Bombshell New Data from Australia May Eliminate Final Reason Anyone Would Take the Covid Vaccines
Australians that got four doses were at the HIGHEST risk of Covid hospitalizations. But wait until you see how many hospitalizations were for the 'unvaccinated.'
We’ve seen the claims a thousand times: The mRNA shots prevent hospitalization from severe Covid-19 and death.
The claim has become so pivotal to the Covidians’ cause that they have rewritten history to lie that the “vaccines” were never meant to prevent infection or transmission — they are solely meant to prevent severe Covid outcomes.
Fine. But new data out of Australia is making the case that Covid-19 is becoming a “pandemic of the vaccinated.” It shows a growing number of Australians who have taken as many as four shots winding up in the hospital. Many of them are dying.
Since there is still a sliver of the public left who has refused the jabs, they haven’t just yet been able to “eliminate the control group.” Lucky for us — and them.
The data comes via the New South Wales government, which recently released the Covid-related mortality data from the final weeks of December.
“There were 95 COVID-19 deaths reported in the two weeks to 31 December 2022. Of these, 16 (17%) had not received three doses of vaccine,” the NSW government crowed.
That would mean 84% of those who died with Covid actually had three mRNA shots.
You almost feel sorry for the government apparatchik that had to type up the Big Pharma-approved disclaimer that we’re all supposed to think this is a “coincidence.”
“COVID-19 vaccines are very effective in preventing the severe impacts of infections with the virus. Over 95 per cent of people aged 16 and over in NSW have received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, while more than 70 per cent of people eligible for their third dose have received it. With such high vaccination coverage in the community, a high proportion of people admitted to hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 are now vaccinated with two or three doses. However, people who are not vaccinated remain more likely to suffer severe COVID-19. Note that some people with COVID-19 who are admitted to hospital or ICU are admitted for conditions unrelated to their COVID-19 infection, and these admissions will not be prevented by vaccination.”
But the NSW government’s cop-out excuse isn’t reflected by the actual data.
The group with the highest number of deaths for the week was actually the four dose group: It beat the “no deaths” group by the count of 53 deaths to 6 deaths.
Perhaps this is a skewed reflection of the data, because so few are unvaccinated? Let’s dig deeper.
The picture doesn’t get any prettier for the Covid shots when we look at hospitalizations.
Peter Sweden on his Substack did the cocktail-napkin math and found that “if you had 4 doses of vaccines, you were a whopping 330% more likely to be hospitalized from covid.”
The numbers were extrapolated from the Australian government’s website.
Here were the Covid hospitalization odds according to number of shots.
1 dose of vaccine: 1 chance in 9105.
2 doses of vaccine: 1 chance in 7988.
3 doses of vaccine: 1 chance in 7537.
4 doses of vaccine: 1 chance in 2117.
So, there you have it. If you account for the fact that 96% of the 16+ population in Australia is “vaccinated” with the “safe and 100% effective” vaccines, then you would expect there to be an adjusted odds-ratio of 19 vaccinated hospitalizations to unvaccinated hospitalizations just to break even.
Instead, there were ZERO hospitalizations in the unvaccinated group. Out of 95 Covid-related deaths, only 6 were among the “unvaccinated.”
No wonder Americans are losing trust in the jabs, as my friend Chief Nerd demonstrated.
It’s gotten so bad that even 33% of Democrats nationally believe that someone they know may have died from side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Then again, maybe America is becoming a nation of “Coincidence Theorists.”
Hi Kyle, Happy New Year and thanks for this.
"The claim has become so pivotal to the Covidians’ cause that they have rewritten history to lie that the “vaccines” were never meant to prevent infection or transmission — they are solely meant to prevent severe Covid outcomes."
I just want to share with you what I sent to my brother on the 14th April 2021:
"#9: THE VACCINES DO NOT STOP TRANSMISSION OR INFECTION
Aren't these vaccines supposed to be what we've been waiting for to "go back to normal"?
Why do you think we're getting all these conflicting messages about needing to practice social distancing and wear masks AFTER we get a vaccine?
The reason is because these vaccines were never designed to stop transmission OR infection.
If you don't believe me, I refer you again to the papers submitted to the FDA I linked to above.
The primary endpoint (what the vaccines are meant to accomplish) is to lower your symptoms.
Sounds like just about every other drug on the market right?
That's it...lowering your symptoms is the big payoff we've been waiting for.
Does that seem completely pointless to anyone but me?
1. It can't stop us from spreading the virus.
2. It can't stop the virus from infecting us once we have it.
3. To get the vaccine is to accept all the risk of these experimental products and the best it might do is lower symptoms?
------------
Let’s now look at some data that suggests vaccinations are making things worse:
“We conclude that the Pfizer vaccines, for the elderly, killed during the 5-week vaccination period about 40 times more people than the disease itself would have killed, and about 260 times more people than the disease among the younger age class. We stress that this is in order to produce a green passport valid at most 6 months, and promote Pfizer sales.” http://www.nakim.org/israel-forums/viewtopic.php?p=276391
You can see many other sources on the webpage, above with links to other scientists and doctors also highlighting this phenomena, e.g.:
“For Brazil, vaccination started in mid-January and a sharp rise in cases is observed since mid-February. Such a steep rise in deaths in Brazil that happened for the last one month never happened in the whole period of pandemic. It already reached twice the height of previous peaks [3]. Globally, the cases started increasing after 5 weeks of a steady decline and coincidentally, the period of rise matches when major vaccination programmes were initiated worldwide. Some countries are now showing a decline, where lockdown and seasonal temperature are playing strong roles. Even for the UK and Israel, where massive vaccination took place, the total deaths in the last three months after vaccination now reached the overall death of the past 10 months before vaccination [2].”
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037/rr-20
Please also refer to the attached graphs that show cases and deaths spiking after vaccination rollouts.
------------
About relative and absolute efficacy:
- 8 out of 18,198 vaccine recipients show symptoms
- 162 out of 18,325 placebo recipients show symptoms
- 95% “relative” risk of symptoms reduction!
- Less than 1% absolute risk of symptoms reduction
All companies use relative efficacy. All companies are mum on infection reduction. Now, where their “selling point” gets especially heinous, is that they switch back to absolute numbers for the following statements.
- Only 1 out of 18,198 vaccine recipients developed severe symptoms
- 3 out of 18,325 placebo recipients developed severe symptoms
- The vaccine practically eliminates severe symptoms!
- Technically true, since your absolute odds are 0.005%, nevermind that your odds without the vaccine are only 0.016%
- You are 3 times less likely to develop severe symptoms with the vaccine!
- Technically true in absolute terms
But since they started in relative terms, let's force the bastards to stay in relative terms:
- 1 out of 8 showing symptoms with the vaccine developed a severe case
- 3 out of 162 showing symptoms with the placebo developed a severe case
- 1/8 to 1/54
- Your relative odds of developing a severe case are 6.75 times higher with the vaccine than with the placebo"
I'm not a shill or a Covidian. I'm just reporting what I sent. I don't know at what point it became political and that these things would actually do what a "vaccine" is supposed to do, but this is what the data I was looking at and what I was reading online was telling me.
I hope you know enough about me from Substack to know I am 1000000000000% against these death shots and have done my upmost to dissuade people from taking them.
Some of what I wrote might be cringe now, I've had to learn a LOT in a very short space of time. If that's the case please forgive me.
Edit, going through the email I believe the FDA reports referenced are:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
https://www.fda.gov/media/144434/download
There’s no such thing as a coincidence.
-- J. Gibbs, NCIS