Covid Revisionists Want Forgiveness, Now Admit 'Conspiracy Theorists' Often Right

"'Amnesty' might be an acceptable arrangement if anyone had ever been held accountable for the Covid-19 response. No one ever has."

The Covid revisionists want us to understand that it’s all been one big misunderstanding.

They didn’t really lie to our faces about masks “working” to stop transmission.

They didn’t really lie to our faces that “lockdowns work” and would slow the spread.

They didn’t really lie to our faces by telling us the “Covid vaccines” stop infection and transmission of the virus.

It’s time to move on. Trust in public health is completely broken, so the solution is for us to forgive and forget, right?

Wrong.

There has never been any serious accountability for the Big Lies told during the Covid pandemic.

No one has been held accountable for the deceptive marketing of the so-called “vaccines.” Nor the human rights violations. Nor the massive fraud perpetrated against the American people.

It’s all been swept under the rug like it was a national fever dream.

But if we allow history to be rewritten, it paves the road to hell for future generations.

It won’t be a matter of ‘if’ another viral pandemic is weaponized against us, but Wen.

One of these Covid revisionists is Dr. Leana Wen.

Born in China, Wen is a former Planned Parenthood president and is now a CNN medical contributor. She also happened to be working at the hospital where the Boston bombing happened.

Wen always seems to be at the wrong place at the right time.

But more to the point, she was at the forefront of dehumanizing Americans who were skeptical about the novel mRNA vaccine that was being rapidly produced during the Covid pandemic and was being forced onto millions without long-term testing.

"We need to start looking at the choice to remain unvaccinated the same as we look at driving while intoxicated," she said. "You have the option to not get vaccinated if you want, but then you can't go out in public."

Here is a montage of Dr. Leana Wen’s “greatest misses” on this topic.

It turns out, as later admitted by the CDC director Rochelle Walensky, the mRNA shots didn’t stop infection or viral transmission. This was known as early as the Delta wave, but it became abundantly clear with the “breakthrough infections” under Omicron.

Wen was also an advocate of draconian lockdowns. She said the only ticket out of social restrictions was to get jabbed with mRNA shots. Kind of like a “social credit score,” amirite?

“My main concern is that we're not going to reach herd immunity because of vaccine hesitancy,” she told Cuomo in April 2021. “And I know that's hard for a lot of people to believe, who desperately want the vaccine right now. And they're thinking, ‘Oh, well, it's just a small percentage of people, who are actually anti-vaxxers.’ And that's true. There is the anti-science, anti-vaxxer contingent.”

“But I think that there are many more people, millions of people who, for whatever reason, have concerns about the vaccine, who just don't know what's in it for them,” she added. “And we need to make it clear to them that the vaccine is the ticket back to pre-Pandemic life. And the window to do that is really narrowing.”

This is as bad as it gets when it comes to Public Health “Experts.” They treated us like we’re cattle in a barnyard to be “herded” into unnatural immunity.

But many of us were reading the scientific literature during the pandemic and had very reasonable questions about the faulty advice being doled out to us.

Johns Hopkins published a working paper that showed clearly that lockdowns across the world did not significantly affect Covid-19 mortality at all.

“More specifically, stringency index studies find that lockdowns in Europe and the United States only reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average,” the authors declared.

But it got worse for lockdown advocates, such as Dr. Leana Wen.

“While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”

But surely the masks worked, right? Dr. Wen at least got something right?

In 2022, Wen changed her tune on masking because, as she unironically put it, “the science has changed.”

"Circumstances have changed. Case counts are declining. Also, the science has changed," Wen said. Thus, the government no longer needed to mandate masks and we could all get our “rights” back.

But Dr. Leana Wen rightly confessed years later that cloth masks are mere “facial decorations.”

"Cloth masks are little more than facial decorations and should not be considered an acceptable form of face covering. The US should require (& distribute) medical-grade surgical masks to be worn in crowded indoor spaces," she tweeted.

So, masks are useless? Not so fast. We were all wearing the “wrong” kinds of masks!

"My point isn’t that we don’t need masks, but rather that we should require masks that are most effective to prevent disease transmission. Everyone, including children, should be wearing at least a 3-ply surgical mask when indoors & around others of unknown vaccination status," she said in another tweet.

According to Wen’s new narrative, we all needed to wear masks that would suffocate us all day long. Because this is a perfectly healthy and sane thing to do, right?

Well, it turns out she backtracked on this story as well, as she revealed in a 2022 editorial in the Washington Post.

"Masking has harmed our son's language development, and limiting both kids' extracurriculars and social interactions would negatively affect their childhood and hinder my and my husband's ability to work,” she admitted.

Amazing. Now, in a video interview at The Bulwark, she completely obliterates nearly every talking point the Public Health “Experts” told us during the Covid pandemic.

“People were concerned about the impact of the vaccines on their menstrual periods. Well as it turns out, there have been studies that have shown that there may be some changes to the menstrual period in the short term,” she said.

You don’t say? So it turns out that women weren’t making that up.

Here’s the scientific literature on the topic.

“It’s also true that … you do get some degree of pretty good immunity after having infection,” she admitted.

The Experts didn’t suddenly “forget” 5,000 years of medical science on Natural Immunity during one pandemic. They lied to push mass hysteria to boost profits and rig elections.

Even Dr. Fauci admitted Natural Immunity is real on CSPAN in 2004, but he didn’t mention it at all for years after Covid-19 began.

“The best vaccination is to get infected yourself,” he said.

So, how was the decision made to ignore immunity from prior infection?
As Paul Offit explained, Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins simply decided against recognizing natural immunity.

You see, that might eat into Big Pharma’s profits and harm vaxx compliance.

It should also surprise absolutely no one that Dr. Wen also downplayed the Wuhan lab leak theory out of concern that it might lead to “anti-Asian hate.”

A funny thing about that: It’s now rapidly becoming “consensus” that the lab leak theory is exactly how Covid-19 started.

Germany's foreign intelligence service now believes there was “a 80-90% chance that coronavirus accidentally leaked from a Chinese lab.”

“Two German newspapers say they have uncovered details of an assessment carried out by spy agency BND in 2020 but never published,” the BBC reported.

Well, isn’t that convenient?

Now, even the New York Times, once the premier Covid fearmongering outlet in the United States, is issuing a mea culpa.

“We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives,” the Times moaned.

“Why haven’t we learned our lesson?” Zenyep Tufekci writes. “Maybe because it’s hard to admit that this research is risky now and to take the requisite steps to keep us safe without also admitting it was always risky. And that perhaps we were misled on purpose.”

More lies. The New York Times was at the forefront of deceiving the American public about Covid-19. Many of us tried to warn everyone about this Grand Deception from the beginning.

This is reminiscent of NYU Professor Scott Galloway asking for “forgiveness” for getting it wrong.

"I was on the board of my kids' school during Covid,” he said. “I wanted a harsher lockdown policy, and in retrospect, I was wrong."

"The damage to kids of keeping them out of school longer was greater than the risks."

"But here's the bottom line, myself, our great people to CDC, I'd like to think the governor [Cuomo], we were all operating with imperfect information and we were doing our best," he continued.

"But let's learn from it. Let's learn from it. Let's learn from it,” he added. “Let's hold each other accountable. But let's bring a little bit of grace and forgiveness for the shit show that was Covid."

Or, as The Atlantic infamously put it, “Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty.”

“Amnesty” might be an acceptable arrangement if anyone had ever been held accountable for the Covid-19 response. No one ever has. This writer was censored and demonetized simply for telling the American people the truth.

So, while Dr. Leana Wen, The New York Times, and others try to spin the history of Covid-19, it is all revisionist history meant to exculpate them and the damage they did.

It’s not because they truly feel sorry. It’s because they want to do it again.