Federal Appeals Court Issues Blockbuster Ruling That Will Change Elections As We Know It
"The court unanimously ruled that this requirement... is a reasonable and necessary safeguard against fraud."
In a significant victory for election integrity, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a mail-in ballot law that ensures voter identity is legally valid.
The federal ruling could have sweeping implications for election integrity laws around the country.
The Fifth Circuit upheld a Texas law requiring voters who apply to vote by mail to submit identification numbers that match state records.
The court unanimously ruled that this requirement—mandating a state driver’s license or partial Social Security number—is a reasonable and necessary safeguard against fraud. Judge James Ho, writing for the three‑judge panel, emphasized that confirming a voter's identity is “plainly material to determining whether an individual is qualified to vote.”
The decision reverses a 2023 ruling by a lower court which had claimed that matching ID numbers were not essential. The appeals court decisively rejected that view, noting it had “no difficulty” concluding the law complied with federal standards and does not violate the Civil Rights Act.
The Fifth Circuit lifted a prior injunction that had temporarily blocked enforcement of the law.
The ID-matching rule is part of Senate Bill 1, Texas’s comprehensive 2021 election integrity legislation.
Judges Ho, Don Willett, and Patrick Higginbotham, all experienced jurists, delivered a solid, unanimous opinion
Supporters view this ruling as a reinforcement of essential election security measures: simple identity confirmation helps ensure ballots are legitimately cast and counted. Little more than a name and address can easily be obtained by fraudsters; requiring a matching ID number adds an essential layer of protection.
While some voting rights groups and the Justice Department raised concerns about mismatches—highlighting more than 60,000 records flagged as of January 2023—they argued these issues threatened eligible voters' access. But the court was unmoved during oral arguments and chose not to press the state’s attorney general with questions.
The case is United States v. Paxton, 5th Cir., No. 23‑50885, decided August 4, 2025.
By reinforcing rules that ensure every mail-in ballot corresponds to a legitimate voter, the court has preserved a key element of election integrity—with minimal burden on law‑abiding citizens.
We need more court rulings like these to ensure that election integrity is the law of the land.
The last thing you should worry about is WW3 because your f00d supply has some evil shlt in it so you better do this......
lp098u.prepper22.com/i9bb5